Will the Republicans Follow Through on Their Promise to Repeal Obamacare?
Yes.
You have probably been reading press stories that bring into question whether or not Republicans will actually keep their campaign promise to "repeal" the Affordable Care Act (ACA). In fact, there is much discussion going on among Congressional Republicans about repealing key funding elements of the ACA as part of a budget process prior to having a replacement ready to pass the Congress.
But, they will defund the core elements of Obamacare sooner rather than later on their way to replacement. They have to. Repealing Obamacare as a first priority was a core campaign promise. If Congressional Republicans and President Trump fail to do this they will suffer a precipitous drop in credibility with their base.
Do Republicans Have a Replacement Plan?
Yes––at least a pretty specific outline for what they would do.
Speaker Paul Ryan's "Better Way" outline, last year's very similar Burr, Hatch, Upton bill (my analysis here), and a number of other similar Republican proposals lay out a clear path for a preferred Republican alternative. Donald Trump said this weekend that his plan, likely very similar to these, will be released once his new Secretary of HHS is confirmed.
These plans share the same key elements but have not yet been put in legislative form or been "scored." Just exactly what the new subsidy/tax credit scheme would look like and how it would impact consumers compared to what we now have in Obamacare is the biggest unknown.
The duduk masalah isn't that they don't have a plan. The duduk masalah is that Republicans don't have a plan that will garner the required 60 votes in the U.S. Senate to become law. With 52 Republicans, they will need at least eight Democrats to join them. There simply are not the eight Democrats, or a guarantee that all 52 Republicans can be counted on, to ensure something like the general Republican replacement outline can become law.
Does This Mean That Republicans Will Retreat on Repeal Until Such Time as They Can Secure the Needed Democratic Support?
No.
First, Republicans are now in so deep on the repeal promise they can't retreat and maintain credibility with their Republican/Trump base.
Second, the reality is that Washington, DC wouldn't be able to find a bipartisan route to get past gridlock on such a complex and politically charged issue as Obamacare without facing hard deadlines for replacement.
Those that argue that Republicans should first have the replacement plan in place before proceeding make the assumption that without the imperative repeal/defund would create the two sides would be able to come to a bipartisan solution. In this Washington, DC? I just don't see that happening.
But Hasn't the Republican "Repeal and Replace" Strategy Now Put Them on the Defensive?
Yes.
Republicans are clearly losing the messaging battle with Democrats now on the offensive. A lack of a clear message about replacement creates a huge information gap that is easy to fill with bleak assessments for how the health insurance market will quickly collapse in the wake of Republican defunding.
Right now, Democrats are effectively, but disingenuously, arguing that repeal without a replacement will lead to millions of people losing their insurance. Disingenuous because Republicans have never intended to repeal without a seamless transition to replacement. But the Democratic arguments just had gasoline poured on them by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) My follow-up post at CNBC.com deals with how the two sides could come to a bipartisan compromise.
Minggu, 19 Agustus 2018
Is The Trump Administration On Its Way To Its Own If You Like Your Health Plan You Can Keep It Fiasco?
On Friday night the administration issued an executive order giving Trump administration appointees enormous flexibility in modifying how the Obamacare individual health insurance market works.
Specifically, President Trump has given his administration the power "to waive, defer, grant exemptions from or delay the implementation of any provision or requirement of [Obamacare]."
The administration has not been clear about just exactly what it is they now want to do.
Their action raises a basic question: Why grant this flexibility if it is not their intent to materially change the way Obamacare works in the individual health insurance market?
Every Republican I know of thinks that Obamacare is failing and unstable––particularly because the plans it offers consumers are especially unattractive to working class and middle class people who can only buy individual health insurance that complies with Obamacare rules. Maybe some of these Republicans know this because that is what I have been saying for three years.
If the Republicans are able to repeal and replace Obamacare, in a best case scenario, they won't be able to have the new kegiatan up and running any sooner than 2019––and that could easily slip to 2020. First, they have to repeal Obamacare. Then they have to replace it by getting at least eight Democrats onside in the Senate. Then the Trump administration and/or the 50 states will have to write the new rules for the new marketplace. Then the health plans will have to develop and price the new plans. Then the states will have to approve them for sale.
So, there is no way, under the best of circumstances, the new scheme will be ready until 2019. Meaning Obamacare will have to operate for the rest of 2017 and at least for 2018.
There are a number of potential steps the Trump administration could take, as the order describes it, to modify "any provision...that would impose a financial burden on individuals, families..."
These could include:
If the pool were to be made worse than it is now, health plans would be challenged to figure out how they could remain in a market already intended for demolition once the new replacement plan was ready in 2019.
In 2017, 31% of counties have only one insurer and 62% of counties have two or fewer insurers in the Obamacare insurance exchanges.
Republicans need to be careful. Making an already fragile insurance exchange market even worse could easily lead to some markets having only one or no health plans selling individual health insurance in 2018. Even if a health plan chooses to stay, a less stable market could lead to even higher prices and deductibles and even narrower provider networks for consumers.
The Republicans have promised to repeal Obamacare, replace it with something better, and make sure no one is hurt in the transition.
But if you take this new executive order to its logical conclusion, doing things like killing or easing the individual mandate or allowing for cheaper medically underwritten plans can't have any effect other than making an already fragile Obamacare risk pool worse. Making the pool worse can only lead to fewer consumer choices, or no choices, or higher rates and bigger out-of-pocket expenses for those who remain in the Obamacare risk pool.
And, remember, about half of those in the Obamacare compliant individual health insurance market are not subsidized. This is not just about poor people getting subsidies. It is also about the health insurance market millions of middle class consumers participate in––many of them Trump voters.
How can Republicans agree with me that Obamacare is unstable and getting worse and think they can make it even more unstable in the transition and people won't get hurt?
On Tuesday, the Senate Finance Committee will hold a hearing on Congressman Tom Price's nomination to be Secretary of Health and Human Services. Senators should be asking Mr. Price if he intends to stabilize or destabilize the already fragile Obamacare risk pool during the transition to the new health insurance kegiatan President Trump has promised us.
Specifically, President Trump has given his administration the power "to waive, defer, grant exemptions from or delay the implementation of any provision or requirement of [Obamacare]."
The administration has not been clear about just exactly what it is they now want to do.
Their action raises a basic question: Why grant this flexibility if it is not their intent to materially change the way Obamacare works in the individual health insurance market?
Every Republican I know of thinks that Obamacare is failing and unstable––particularly because the plans it offers consumers are especially unattractive to working class and middle class people who can only buy individual health insurance that complies with Obamacare rules. Maybe some of these Republicans know this because that is what I have been saying for three years.
If the Republicans are able to repeal and replace Obamacare, in a best case scenario, they won't be able to have the new kegiatan up and running any sooner than 2019––and that could easily slip to 2020. First, they have to repeal Obamacare. Then they have to replace it by getting at least eight Democrats onside in the Senate. Then the Trump administration and/or the 50 states will have to write the new rules for the new marketplace. Then the health plans will have to develop and price the new plans. Then the states will have to approve them for sale.
So, there is no way, under the best of circumstances, the new scheme will be ready until 2019. Meaning Obamacare will have to operate for the rest of 2017 and at least for 2018.
There are a number of potential steps the Trump administration could take, as the order describes it, to modify "any provision...that would impose a financial burden on individuals, families..."
These could include:
- Refusing to enforce the very unpopular individual mandate's penalty for not purchasing health insurance.
- Leaving the mandate and its penalty in place but dramatically increasing the Obama administration's "hardship" exemptions in the face of the expensive high deductible plans people now face.
- Enabling health insurers to offer limited duration health insurance plans that they are still allowed to medically underwrite. The Obama administration had intended to eliminate these policies that provided more than three months of coverage. By bringing these policies back to the market, a parallel market of cheaper plans attractive to the healthy could be created thereby pulling healthy consumers out of the Obamacare pool.
If the pool were to be made worse than it is now, health plans would be challenged to figure out how they could remain in a market already intended for demolition once the new replacement plan was ready in 2019.
In 2017, 31% of counties have only one insurer and 62% of counties have two or fewer insurers in the Obamacare insurance exchanges.
Republicans need to be careful. Making an already fragile insurance exchange market even worse could easily lead to some markets having only one or no health plans selling individual health insurance in 2018. Even if a health plan chooses to stay, a less stable market could lead to even higher prices and deductibles and even narrower provider networks for consumers.
The Republicans have promised to repeal Obamacare, replace it with something better, and make sure no one is hurt in the transition.
But if you take this new executive order to its logical conclusion, doing things like killing or easing the individual mandate or allowing for cheaper medically underwritten plans can't have any effect other than making an already fragile Obamacare risk pool worse. Making the pool worse can only lead to fewer consumer choices, or no choices, or higher rates and bigger out-of-pocket expenses for those who remain in the Obamacare risk pool.
And, remember, about half of those in the Obamacare compliant individual health insurance market are not subsidized. This is not just about poor people getting subsidies. It is also about the health insurance market millions of middle class consumers participate in––many of them Trump voters.
How can Republicans agree with me that Obamacare is unstable and getting worse and think they can make it even more unstable in the transition and people won't get hurt?
On Tuesday, the Senate Finance Committee will hold a hearing on Congressman Tom Price's nomination to be Secretary of Health and Human Services. Senators should be asking Mr. Price if he intends to stabilize or destabilize the already fragile Obamacare risk pool during the transition to the new health insurance kegiatan President Trump has promised us.